Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 18:19:54 +0530,
sunil arora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bruno,
thanks for the reply,
we did run vaccum on it.. and we do it regulary to maintain its
performance but its not giving the expected results.
Did you do VACUUM FULL or just plain VACUU
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 18:19:54 +0530,
sunil arora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruno,
> thanks for the reply,
> we did run vaccum on it.. and we do it regulary to maintain its
> performance but its not giving the expected results.
Did you do VACUUM FULL or just plain VACUUM?
> I dont know but
Bruno,
thanks for the reply,
we did run vaccum on it.. and we do it regulary to maintain its
performance but its not giving the expected results.
I dont know but if we delete the entire database and restore it with
the dump, then things seems to improve a _LOT_.
Isnt vaccum suppose to do the same
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 22:13:04 +0530,
sunil arora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> this is my first post to this emailing list. We are using postgres-7.4
> in a Server based application which requires frequent updates and
> inserts of the database. We have observed a substantial fall
Hi folks,
this is my first post to this emailing list. We are using postgres-7.4
in a Server based application which requires frequent updates and
inserts of the database. We have observed a substantial fall in the
performance of database server over the time. It works fine for some
initial days a
