On 9/09/2010 11:02 AM, Lazaro Ruben Garcia Martinez wrote:
Thank you very much for your answer, In the cluster that i said before I need
only failover.
In the documentation of postgresql I read about the Shared Disk Failover, this
tecnique avoids synchronization overhead by having only one copy
On 09/08/10 8:02 PM, Lazaro Ruben Garcia Martinez wrote:
Thank you very much for your answer, In the cluster that i said before
I need only failover.
In the documentation of postgresql I read about the Shared Disk
Failover, this tecnique avoids synchronization overhead by having only
one copy
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Lazaro Ruben Garcia Martinez
wrote:
> Thank you very much for your answer, In the cluster that i said before I
> need only failover.
> In the documentation of postgresql I read about the Shared Disk Failover,
> this tecnique avoids synchronization overhead by having
Thank you very much for your answer, In the cluster that i said before I need
only failover.
In the documentation of postgresql I read about the Shared Disk Failover, this
tecnique avoids synchronization overhead by having only one copy of the
database. It uses a single disk array that is share
On 9/09/2010 10:27 AM, Lazaro Ruben Garcia Martinez wrote:
Hello everyone:
I am a student of the University of Informatics Science in Cuba. I
want create a postgresql cluster and I have two servers but I have a
doubt. Is possible to create a cluster of postgresql server by sharing
the database f
Hello everyone:
I am a student of the University of Informatics Science in Cuba. I want create
a postgresql cluster and I have two servers but I have a doubt. Is possible to
create a cluster of postgresql server by sharing the database file on a SAN?
Regards.
Thank you very much for your tim
