Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 12:24:51PM -0700, TJ O'Donnell wrote:
I've written some extensions to postgres to implement
chemical structure searching. I get inquiries about
the performance of postgres vs. oracle. This is a huge
topic, with lots of opinions and lots of facts. Bu
On Tuesday 2006-06-13 16:19, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 12:24:51PM -0700, TJ O'Donnell wrote:
> > I've written some extensions to postgres to implement
> > chemical structure searching. I get inquiries about
> > the performance of postgres vs. oracle. This is a huge
> > topic,
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 12:24:51PM -0700, TJ O'Donnell wrote:
> I've written some extensions to postgres to implement
> chemical structure searching. I get inquiries about
> the performance of postgres vs. oracle. This is a huge
> topic, with lots of opinions and lots of facts. But,
> today I go
On Mon, 15 May 2006 16:00:04 -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> 5: You're gonna need to load test this to see. You can get
> the oracle 10G express for free. I think that one handles
> multiple connections, but is limited to 2 gigs of data.
The exact limitations of Oracle Database XE are as follows
On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 14:24, TJ O'Donnell wrote:
> I've written some extensions to postgres to implement
> chemical structure searching. I get inquiries about
> the performance of postgres vs. oracle. This is a huge
> topic, with lots of opinions and lots of facts. But,
> today I got some feedba
I've written some extensions to postgres to implement
chemical structure searching. I get inquiries about
the performance of postgres vs. oracle. This is a huge
topic, with lots of opinions and lots of facts. But,
today I got some feedback stating the opinion that:
"Postgres performance diminis
