On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 22:53 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Damian Carey wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 6:18 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> > > Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Mostly, I think you will find that the back end developers aren't fond
> > >> of Java and thus, it doesn't get much lov
Greg Smith wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
is pl/java kind of dead? I don't see much activity since years ago.
this page seems quite out of date, talking about 1.1.0b1 released,
but the foundry has 1.4.0 from 2008 that supports 8.3. only
The last set of commits there was about 9 months ago, so
Damian Carey wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 6:18 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> > Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >>
> >> Mostly, I think you will find that the back end developers aren't fond
> >> of Java and thus, it doesn't get much love.
> >>
> >> There is a reason that plPerl is king in this community
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 6:18 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>
>> Mostly, I think you will find that the back end developers aren't fond
>> of Java and thus, it doesn't get much love.
>>
>> There is a reason that plPerl is king in this community (and I don't
>> even like Perl).
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Mostly, I think you will find that the back end developers aren't fond
of Java and thus, it doesn't get much love.
There is a reason that plPerl is king in this community (and I don't
even like Perl).
yeah, understood. I'm getting the request 2nd hand, from someone
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 13:41 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> John R Pierce wrote:
> > is pl/java kind of dead? I don't see much activity since years ago.
>
> I've been a bit worried about that myself. With OpenJDK and a GPL java,
> it makes a lot of sense to make Java a first-class PL in PostgreSQL.
John R Pierce wrote:
> is pl/java kind of dead? I don't see much activity since years ago.
I've been a bit worried about that myself. With OpenJDK and a GPL java,
it makes a lot of sense to make Java a first-class PL in PostgreSQL.
There's a fair bit of activity from Java-using users, and there'
Greg Smith wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
is pl/java kind of dead? I don't see much activity since years ago.
this page seems quite out of date, talking about 1.1.0b1 released,
but the foundry has 1.4.0 from 2008 that supports 8.3. only
The last set of commits there was about 9 months ago, so
John R Pierce wrote:
is pl/java kind of dead? I don't see much activity since years ago.
this page seems quite out of date, talking about 1.1.0b1 released, but
the foundry has 1.4.0 from 2008 that supports 8.3. only
The last set of commits there was about 9 months ago, so it's not quite
as
is pl/java kind of dead? I don't see much activity since years ago.
I note the pgfoundry page, http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pljava/?readme
the link to the project home page
http://wiki.tada.se/display/pljava/Home is broken
this page seems quite out of date, talking about 1.1.0b1 released
10 matches
Mail list logo
