On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 3:23 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 2/28/2014 5:06 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>
>> You could expect a loss of 20% at I/O level by using a virtualized
>> environment compared to a physical server with similar hardware (rule
>> of thumb, number more or less general by experien
On 2/28/2014 5:06 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
You could expect a loss of 20% at I/O level by using a virtualized
environment compared to a physical server with similar hardware (rule
of thumb, number more or less general by experience).
and that could be 200% or more if there is IO and/or CPU co
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Arun P.L wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is there any chances for any performance issues with pg_restore when
> changing the servers, like openvz, xen, etc.?
You could expect a loss of 20% at I/O level by using a virtualized
environment compared to a physical server with similar h
Hi
Is there any chances for any performance issues with pg_restore when changing
the servers, like openvz, xen, etc.? Will the server difference make the time
of restore longer in this case?
ThanksArun
