HEAD only appears in 8.2, but 8.1.X means it will appear in 8.1.5.
---
Joe Kramer wrote:
> If it was commited to HEAD, it will appear in 8.1.5, right?
>
> On 5/30/06, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > Patch applied to CVS HEAD
If it was commited to HEAD, it will appear in 8.1.5, right?
On 5/30/06, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Patch applied to CVS HEAD and 8.1.X. Thanks.
---
Marko Kreen wrote:
> On 5/9/06, Joe Kramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > O
Patch applied to CVS HEAD and 8.1.X. Thanks.
---
Marko Kreen wrote:
> On 5/9/06, Joe Kramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 5/9/06, Marko Kreen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The fact that Fedora pgcrypto is linked wi
On 5/10/06, Bruno Wolff III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 22:17:21 +0300,
Joe Kramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Right on! SHA2 should fallback the same as AES!
Note that it's SHA256, not SHA2.
It's SHA224/256/384/512, which together are more easily referred as SHA2.
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 22:17:21 +0300,
Joe Kramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Right on! SHA2 should fallback the same as AES!
Note that it's SHA256, not SHA2.
SHA-1 is really a fix of the original SHA (sometimes referred to as SHA-0).
---(end of broadcast)-
On 5/9/06, Marko Kreen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/9/06, Joe Kramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> On 5/9/06, Marko Kreen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > The fact that Fedora pgcrypto is linked with OpenSSL that does not
> > support SHA256 is not a bug, just a fact.>> It's not Fedora only, same prob
On 5/9/06, Joe Kramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/9/06, Marko Kreen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The fact that Fedora pgcrypto is linked with OpenSSL that does not
> support SHA256 is not a bug, just a fact.
It's not Fedora only, same problem with Gentoo/portage.
I think it's problem for all
On 5/9/06, Marko Kreen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/9/06, Joe Kramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Thanks, but I need it to work out-of-the-box, with standard installation of> RedHat or Gentoo and standard PostgreSQL rpm.
>> I am developing application with PortgreSQL and I can't tell customer to
On 5/9/06, Joe Kramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks, but I need it to work out-of-the-box, with standard installation of
RedHat or Gentoo and standard PostgreSQL rpm.
I am developing application with PortgreSQL and I can't tell customer to
"Recompile PostgreSQL and see if it works then try
Thanks, but I need it to work out-of-the-box, with standard installation of RedHat or Gentoo and standard PostgreSQL rpm.
I am developing application with PortgreSQL and I can't tell customer
to "Recompile PostgreSQL and see if it works then try to use non-openssl pgcrypto or try to compile
open
On 5/9/06, Joe Kramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fedora core has OpenSSL 0.9.7 installed by default. And it's not possible to
install 0.9.8 because of glibc conflict.
I suspect pgcrypto looks for SHA256 in OpeSSL lib when it should use
built-in.
SHA256 is working fine on Windows but on Redhat it
Hello,Pgcrypto SHA 256/384/512 algorithm don't work on RedHat:
db=# SELECT digest('test', 'sha1');
digest
--
\251J\217\345\314\261\233\246\034L\010s\323\221\351\207\230/\273\323
(1 row)
db=# SELECT
12 matches
Mail list logo
