[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Brandon Metcalf") writes:
> I've been looking at the auto vacuum daemon pgavd and it looks like
> there hasn't been any development activity in a while. Does anyone
> know that status of pgavd?
The pgavd "tarball" has not been touched since September 2002.
http://cvsup.de.op
"Matthew T. O'Connor" writes:
> There has been extensive conversation in the last few days, however I
> think Brandon is referencing pgavd which is a project on gborg, which
> was an autovacuum implementation started by someone else that never
> took off. This is totally separate from pg_autovac
Douglas McNaught wrote:
"Brandon Metcalf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I've been looking at the auto vacuum daemon pgavd and it looks like
there hasn't been any development activity in a while. Does anyone
know that status of pgavd?
Also, I'd be interested in hearing how well it works and
d == [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
d> "Brandon Metcalf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
d> > I've been looking at the auto vacuum daemon pgavd and it looks like
d> > there hasn't been any development activity in a while. Does anyone
d> > know that status of pgavd?
d> >
d> > Also, I'd be interested
"Brandon Metcalf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've been looking at the auto vacuum daemon pgavd and it looks like
> there hasn't been any development activity in a while. Does anyone
> know that status of pgavd?
>
> Also, I'd be interested in hearing how well it works and if there are
> any pla
I've been looking at the auto vacuum daemon pgavd and it looks like
there hasn't been any development activity in a while. Does anyone
know that status of pgavd?
Also, I'd be interested in hearing how well it works and if there are
any plans to include this daemon in the pgsql distribution.
--
