On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 20:55, Tom Lane wrote:
> Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "TL" == Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > TL> ... On looking at the code I see that it doesn't make any
> > TL> attempt to prune future log segments after a decrease in
> > TL> checkpoint_segments, so
"Jeffrey W. Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry, my last mail got cut off. The server aborted because it couldn't
> write the xlog. Looks like I omitted this from my last mail:
Selective quoting of the log output? Naughty naughty.
However, that still doesn't explain how you got into the
On Thu, 2004-05-13 at 09:28, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jeffrey W. Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Sorry, my last mail got cut off. The server aborted because it couldn't
> > write the xlog. Looks like I omitted this from my last mail:
>
> Selective quoting of the log output? Naughty naughty.
>
On Thu, 2004-05-13 at 06:10, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jeffrey W. Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Oh sure, it's bleating. Apparently my computer is too fast:
>
> I don't think the checkpoint process is completing.
>
> > May 12 16:37:08 mistral postgres[506]: [174-1] LOG: server process (PID 164
"Jeffrey W. Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oh sure, it's bleating. Apparently my computer is too fast:
I don't think the checkpoint process is completing.
> May 12 16:37:08 mistral postgres[506]: [174-1] LOG: server process (PID 16403) was
> terminated by signal 6
You need to find out w
