On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 7:02:13 am Alban Hertroys wrote:
> On 20 December 2011 15:35, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> > To elaborate on my previous answer, search_path is in postgresql.conf
> > because it is tied to the database cluster not a particular database.
>
> Not necessarily, it can also be
On 20 December 2011 15:35, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> To elaborate on my previous answer, search_path is in postgresql.conf because
> it
> is tied to the database cluster not a particular database.
Not necessarily, it can also be tied to a schema or a role or (I
assume) a specific database in the cl
On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 2:48:31 am Daniel Migowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know this discussion has already been made, but for us it is a real
> problem that database properties are not restored with pg_restore. For me,
> the comment on a database, as well as the properties like pg_search_path
>
On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 2:48:31 am Daniel Migowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know this discussion has already been made, but for us it is a real
> problem that database properties are not restored with pg_restore. For me,
> the comment on a database, as well as the properties like pg_search_path
>
Hi,
I know this discussion has already been made, but for us it is a real problem
that database properties are not restored with pg_restore. For me, the comment
on a database, as well as the properties like pg_search_path are part of the
data of the database. They are even contained in the dump
