I understand this, but does it set the indisprimary flag in the pg_index
table? The reason I ask is because I am writing a web based app to
administer a pgsql database and am attempting to keep track of the
indices/keys.
This is the property I am looking at determine whether the index is a
prima
On Sun, Jul 25, 1999 at 03:13:39PM +1000, Chris Bitmead wrote:
> Dan Wilson wrote:
>
> > Yes, I am aware that the primary key does not really mean anything except
> > implicitly making it a unique key, but it's supposed to be there for
> > compatibility and it's not even in the dump.
>
> Someone
Dan Wilson wrote:
> Yes, I am aware that the primary key does not really mean anything except
> implicitly making it a unique key, but it's supposed to be there for
> compatibility and it's not even in the dump.
Someone mentioned recently that primary key enforces nulls as unique
whereas unique
I was looking at the pg_dump and realized that it does not indicate the
primary keys.
Why is this? It does dump the primary keys with the indexed, however as far
as I could tell, it did not indicate anything as the primary key.
Yes, I am aware that the primary key does not really mean anything
