Re: [GENERAL] perl(Pg) (S)RPM

2003-12-02 Thread Lamar Owen
On Tuesday 02 December 2003 06:05 pm, Roderick A. Anderson wrote: > On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Lamar Owen wrote: > > exists). If no one else can do this, I can, but it's not high on my list > > of priorities. > What you have a life? :-) And four kidsoh, that's an 'l', not a 'w' :-) > OK it i

Re: [GENERAL] perl(Pg) (S)RPM

2003-12-02 Thread Roderick A. Anderson
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Lamar Owen wrote: > Because Pg is no longer distributed as a part of the main tarball, but a > contrib is being distributed that requires it. This is an issue with the > main tarball, not with the RPM packaging, IMO. Someone needs to step up to > the plate and build a Pg R

Re: [GENERAL] perl(Pg) (S)RPM

2003-12-01 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Roderick A. Anderson writes: > Any pointers as to why (really) I'm getting this error when I try to > install Pg 7.4 from a SRPM build? > > perl(Pg) is needed by postgresql-contrib-7.4-0.2PGDG As the message says, one package requires the other. > I only disabled tcl, tkpkg, pltcl, and pyt

[GENERAL] perl(Pg) (S)RPM

2003-12-01 Thread Roderick A. Anderson
Any pointers as to why (really) I'm getting this error when I try to install Pg 7.4 from a SRPM build? perl(Pg) is needed by postgresql-contrib-7.4-0.2PGDG I only disabled tcl, tkpkg, pltcl, and python in the SPEC file. I could not install the contrib stuff but I really want the plperl