Thanks, Neil.
Hubert Fröhlich wrote:
Those days, we had PostgreSQL 7.1 and 7.2, and we had to be careful
oids approaching 2^32 (2.14 billion)
Now, we have 8.0. What does the situation look like?
With the default settings, there is exactly the same risk of OID
wraparound as in earlier releases.
Hubert Fröhlich wrote:
Those days, we had PostgreSQL 7.1 and 7.2, and we had to be careful oids
approaching 2^32 (2.14 billion)
Now, we have 8.0. What does the situation look like?
With the default settings, there is exactly the same risk of OID
wraparound as in earlier releases. However, you ca
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 07:24 pm, Hubert Fröhlich wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> some time ago, there was a discussion about oid wraparound. See
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2002-10/msg00561.php .
>
> Those days, we had PostgreSQL 7.1 and 7.2, and we had to be careful
> oids approaching 2^
Hi list,
some time ago, there was a discussion about oid wraparound. See
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2002-10/msg00561.php .
Those days, we had PostgreSQL 7.1 and 7.2, and we had to be careful
oids approaching 2^32 (2.14 billion)
Now, we have 8.0. What does the situation look li
