Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ed L. wrote:
>> I ran a simple select-for-update test on 8.1.2 and was curious as
>> to why the semantics are what they are. Specifically, when you
>> have multiple select-for-update-limit queries on the same rows,
>> why are rows selected by the blo
Ed L. wrote:
> I ran a simple select-for-update test on 8.1.2 and was curious as
> to why the semantics are what they are. Specifically, when you
> have multiple select-for-update-limit queries on the same rows,
> why are rows selected by the blocked query before knowing if
> some of those row
I ran a simple select-for-update test on 8.1.2 and was curious as
to why the semantics are what they are. Specifically, when you
have multiple select-for-update-limit queries on the same rows,
why are rows selected by the blocked query before knowing if
some of those rows will be removed/elimi
