Re: [GENERAL] materialised views vs unlogged table (also, ize vs ise)

2014-05-19 Thread Tim Kane
> >> Aside from the convenience of the REFRESH functionality, are there any other >> factors I should consider? > An exclusive lock is taken on the materialized view during a REFRESH > operation, blocking an read or write queries attempted on them. You > can tackle this limitation in the upcomi

Re: [GENERAL] materialised views vs unlogged table (also, ize vs ise)

2014-05-18 Thread Michael Paquier
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Tim Kane wrote: > Aside from the convenience of the REFRESH functionality, are there any other > factors I should consider? An exclusive lock is taken on the materialized view during a REFRESH operation, blocking an read or write queries attempted on them. You can

Re: [GENERAL] materialised views vs unlogged table (also, ize vs ise)

2014-05-18 Thread Vik Fearing
On 05/18/2014 05:47 PM, Tim Kane wrote: > Oh, I also noticed we don’t support alternate spellings of > MATERIALIZE, as we do for ANALYZE. > I’m not sure if we do this anywhere else, maybe it’s just analyze > being the odd one out. For the moment, if not forever, ANALYSE is the odd one out. http:

[GENERAL] materialised views vs unlogged table (also, ize vs ise)

2014-05-18 Thread Tim Kane
HI all, I’m curious about materialised views. I was just setting something up, and noticed there is no support for UNLOGGED materialised views (http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/E1UZNrD-0008Eh-83@gemulon.postgresql.o rg) I also notice that the creation of an unlogged table appears to be a lot