On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 10:27 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Brad Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Will do. Is this strictly an 8.2 patch, or will it be back-ported to
> > 8.1 and 7.4?
>
> We aren't going to change the behavior of logging that much in existing
> releases --- or were you just thi
Brad Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Will do. Is this strictly an 8.2 patch, or will it be back-ported to
> 8.1 and 7.4?
We aren't going to change the behavior of logging that much in existing
releases --- or were you just thinking of that core-dump condition in
8.1? That's fixed in 8.1.
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 10:14 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Brad Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm wondering what that status of the fix for this is.
>
> AFAIK it all works ... grab beta2 and try it.
>
Will do. Is this strictly an 8.2 patch, or will it be back-ported to
8.1 and 7.4?
--
B
Brad Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm wondering what that status of the fix for this is.
AFAIK it all works ... grab beta2 and try it.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the p
I'm wondering what that status of the fix for this is. Looking at the
archives, it looks like Bruce had a patch
http://beta.linuxports.com/pgsql-jdbc/2006-08/msg00036.php
I don't see anything in the release notes though. What's the status on
this?
--
Brad Nicholson 416-673-4106
Database Admini
