Re: [GENERAL] libpq version in rpm packages

2005-11-09 Thread Matthew T. O'Connor
Brian Mathis wrote: I just set up a new server and would like to use rpms to manage the software on this one. I've done the compile from source thing most of the time, but over time it seems to get messy. I'm using CentOS 4.2, which only has packages for postgres 7.4, but I very much want to

Re: [GENERAL] libpq version in rpm packages

2005-11-09 Thread Devrim GUNDUZ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Brian Mathis wrote: I noticed that the x86_64 version of the compat libs installs the files in /usr/lib, while the x86_64 postgresql-libs rpm uses /usr/lib64. Is there are reason for that? Otherwise, I'd prefer to keep all

Re: [GENERAL] libpq version in rpm packages

2005-11-09 Thread Brian Mathis
Thanks for that rpm. I noticed that the x86_64 version of the compat libs installs the files in /usr/lib, while the x86_64 postgresql-libs rpm uses /usr/lib64.  Is there are reason for that?  Otherwise, I'd prefer to keep all the 64bit libs in lib64. On 11/9/05, Devrim GUNDUZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Re: [GENERAL] libpq version in rpm packages

2005-11-09 Thread Devrim GUNDUZ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Brian Mathis wrote: I'm using CentOS 4.2, which only has packages for postgres 7.4, but I very much want to use 8.1. I installed the 8.1 RPMs, but when I try to install packages like perl-DBD-Pg, or php-pgsql, rpm complains

[GENERAL] libpq version in rpm packages

2005-11-09 Thread Brian Mathis
I just set up a new server and would like to use rpms to manage the software on this one.  I've done the compile from source thing most of the time, but over time it seems to get messy. I'm using CentOS 4.2, which only has packages for postgres 7.4, but I very much want to use 8.1.  I installed th