[GENERAL] large tuple

2000-12-03 Thread Kenneth Been
I set BLCKSZ to 32768, as described in FAQ question 4.6, and recompiled and reinstalled the system, and I am still getting the error "Tuple is too big: size 9588, max size 8140". Any ideas why that would be? Is there also something else I need to do? Thank you. Ken

Re: [GENERAL] large tuple

2000-11-28 Thread Tom Lane
Kenneth Been <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 2. I ran "make clean" before running "make". Maybe there is > a problem with the dependencies in the makefiles? There are no dependencies in the Makefiles, unless you did "make depend". "make clean" is usually necessary after changing any widely-used h

Re: [GENERAL] large tuple

2000-11-28 Thread Kenneth Been
Well, I solved this problem by doing two things: 1. I used 16384 instead of 32768. I can't imagine this made any difference. 2. I ran "make clean" before running "make". Maybe there is a problem with the dependencies in the makefiles? Ken Kenneth Been wrote: > > I set BLCKSZ to 32768, as de

[GENERAL] large tuple

2000-11-28 Thread Kenneth Been
I set BLCKSZ to 32768, as described in FAQ question 4.6, recompiled and reinstalled the system, and ran initdb, and I am still getting the error "Tuple is too big: size 9588, max size 8140". I am using 7.0.2 on a modified RedHat 6.0 (with glibc upgraded to 2.1.3). Any ideas why that would be? I