Re: [GENERAL] invalid byte sequence for encoding "UNICODE"

2008-07-25 Thread valgog
On Jul 24, 8:06 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (AlannY) wrote: > Hi there. > > Many times, I'm confronting with that strange problem: invalid byte > sequence for encoding "UNICODE". So, I guess, Postgresql can't allow me > to use some symbols which is not a part of UNICODE. But what is that > symbals? > > I

Re: [GENERAL] invalid byte sequence for encoding "UNICODE"

2008-07-24 Thread Tom Lane
AlannY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Many times, I'm confronting with that strange problem: invalid byte > sequence for encoding "UNICODE". So, I guess, Postgresql can't allow me > to use some symbols which is not a part of UNICODE. But what is that > symbals? Doesn't it tell you? AFAICS every

[GENERAL] invalid byte sequence for encoding "UNICODE"

2008-07-24 Thread AlannY
Hi there. Many times, I'm confronting with that strange problem: invalid byte sequence for encoding "UNICODE". So, I guess, Postgresql can't allow me to use some symbols which is not a part of UNICODE. But what is that symbals? I'm attaching a screenshot with THAT dead-symbol. As you can see