Re: [GENERAL] documentation vs reality: template databases

2007-01-21 Thread Bruce Momjian
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > For example, one could drop template1 and recreate it from > > template0 without any ill effects. This course of action > > might be advisable if one has carelessly added a bunch of junk in > > ! template1. (To delete templa

Re: [GENERAL] documentation vs reality: template databases

2007-01-21 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Bruce Momjian wrote: > For example, one could drop template1 and recreate it from > template0 without any ill effects. This course of action > might be advisable if one has carelessly added a bunch of junk in > ! template1. (To delete template1, > ! it must have datistem

Re: [GENERAL] documentation vs reality: template databases

2007-01-20 Thread Bruce Momjian
Richard P. Welty wrote: > running 8.1 on a fedora core 5 linux box, up to date so far as > i know. > > this page: > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/manage-ag-templatedbs.html > > says the following: > > Note: template1 and template0 do not have any special status beyond >

Re: [GENERAL] documentation vs reality: template databases

2007-01-11 Thread Chris
Richard P. Welty wrote: running 8.1 on a fedora core 5 linux box, up to date so far as i know. this page: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/manage-ag-templatedbs.html says the following: Note: template1 and template0 do not have any special status beyond the fact that the

[GENERAL] documentation vs reality: template databases

2007-01-11 Thread Richard P. Welty
running 8.1 on a fedora core 5 linux box, up to date so far as i know. this page: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/manage-ag-templatedbs.html says the following: Note: template1 and template0 do not have any special status beyond the fact that the name template1 is the def