On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 12:55:18AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Fine for you, not so fine for other people with different concerns.
>
> I'm not unsympathetic to your general point, but black-and-white
> arguments won't get far in this discussion. It's all about tradeoffs
> ... it's most definitely no
Tom Lane wrote:
Dragan Matic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I was about to say the same thing. I think that the whole point in
having a portable database system is that the data inside the database
should behave the _same way_ no matter what operating system database is
running on - client sho
Dragan Matic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was about to say the same thing. I think that the whole point in
> having a portable database system is that the data inside the database
> should behave the _same way_ no matter what operating system database is
> running on - client shouldn't be awa
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 12:25:43PM -0400, Agent M wrote:
> On Jul 2, 2006, at 6:13 AM, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> >But I don't think anyone is actually considering importing ICU into the
> >postgres source tree, are they?
> Why not?
Because it's a project of similar size to postgres and proba
On 7/2/06, Agent M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Certain Japanese characters cannot make a reliable round-trip through
Unicode. ICU uses UTF-16 as its store, so the Japanese folks won't be
happy with an ICU-only solution. However, it would still be of great
Could you explain what you mean and wha
On Jul 2, 2006, at 6:13 AM, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
But I don't think anyone is actually considering importing ICU into the
postgres source tree, are they?
Why not?
Size - I'm not sure this is relevent since I don't think we want to
incorporate it into postgres itself, just let people us
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 12:13:02PM +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> However, the most important point is that people have said they'll take
> the speed hit if they could get consistant collation.
I can second that.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD
Tomi NA wrote:
On 6/30/06, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 11:56:19AM +0200, Dragan Matic wrote:
> I have two postgres servers, one on linux (fedora core 5), one on
> windows, both are version 8.1.4.
>
Not beeing able to depend on the engine to consistently collate
stri
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 06:23:07PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Tomi NA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Basically, it comes down to three possibilities, doesn't it:
> > 1.) use an existing library
> > 2.) write a pgsql specific implementation
> > 3.) forget about it and tend to other issues
>
> > Pe
"Tomi NA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Basically, it comes down to three possibilities, doesn't it:
> 1.) use an existing library
> 2.) write a pgsql specific implementation
> 3.) forget about it and tend to other issues
> Personally, I don't really care if it's 1) or 2): I'm just afraid it's
> g
On 7/1/06, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 07:29:12PM +0200, Tomi NA wrote:
> If I sound harsh, please excuse me, but I feel like I'm the only one
> who thinks these encoding problems (collation, upper/lowercase,
> multiple languages in a single database) are serious...nobo
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 07:29:12PM +0200, Tomi NA wrote:
> If I sound harsh, please excuse me, but I feel like I'm the only one
> who thinks these encoding problems (collation, upper/lowercase,
> multiple languages in a single database) are serious...nobody seems to
> share the sentiment. Ah well..
On 6/30/06, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 11:56:19AM +0200, Dragan Matic wrote:
> I have two postgres servers, one on linux (fedora core 5), one on
> windows, both are version 8.1.4.
>
> Both databases are initialized with locale Croatian and win1250 encoding.
>
> running
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 11:56:19AM +0200, Dragan Matic wrote:
> I have two postgres servers, one on linux (fedora core 5), one on
> windows, both are version 8.1.4.
>
> Both databases are initialized with locale Croatian and win1250 encoding.
>
> running pg_controldata on windows returns this
>
I have two postgres servers, one on linux (fedora core 5), one on
windows, both are version 8.1.4.
Both databases are initialized with locale Croatian and win1250 encoding.
running pg_controldata on windows returns this
LC_COLLATE: Croatian_Croatia.1250
LC_CTYPE:Croatian_C
15 matches
Mail list logo
