Re: [GENERAL] could not read block... how could I identify/fix

2012-03-29 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Naoko Reeves wrote: > Vick, > Thank you very much. Yes, I just go ahead did what you said and all appears > to be fine. You definitely need to check your hardware for faults, especially the one that caused your server to crash. Run some memory tests, drive tests

Re: [GENERAL] could not read block... how could I identify/fix

2012-03-29 Thread Naoko Reeves
Vick, Thank you very much. Yes, I just go ahead did what you said and all appears to be fine. On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Vick Khera wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Naoko Reeves > wrote: > > Do you think this should be the next step I might take? > > Could you give me an advice

Re: [GENERAL] could not read block... how could I identify/fix

2012-03-29 Thread Vick Khera
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Naoko Reeves wrote: > Version: "PostgreSQL 8.4.6 on Oh, and also upgrade to 8.4.11 to ensure you do not have any known data loss bugs. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgres

Re: [GENERAL] could not read block... how could I identify/fix

2012-03-29 Thread Vick Khera
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Naoko Reeves wrote: > Do you think this should be the next step I might take? > Could you give me an advice of how I could identify corrupted error. It seems to me that since you can successfully dump the table (I assume you validated the data was all there someho

[GENERAL] could not read block... how could I identify/fix

2012-03-28 Thread Naoko Reeves
There was a hardware crash. Since then INSERT to one table is failing with the following message: ERROR: could not read block 11857 of relation base/16396/3720450: read only 0 of 8192 bytes ERROR: could not read block 11805 of relation base/16396/3720450: read only 0 of 8192 bytes Similar error