Re: [GENERAL] continued segmentation fault

2006-09-28 Thread Geoffrey
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 02:57:09PM -0400, Geoffrey wrote: We continue to have segmentation faults of the /usr/bin/postgres process as I mentioned in an earlier thread. In all cases, the core file always indicates a segmentation fault, but the backtraces don't see

Re: [GENERAL] continued segmentation fault

2006-09-28 Thread Geoffrey
Bob wrote: Is there any reason can't update to a newer version. Like 8.x? We plan on going to the latest 7.4 the first of October. The latest 8.x is on the schedule, but there will be coding changes required and extensive testing, so that's a bit further out. Geoffrey wrote: We continue

Re: [GENERAL] continued segmentation fault

2006-09-28 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 02:57:09PM -0400, Geoffrey wrote: > We continue to have segmentation faults of the /usr/bin/postgres process > as I mentioned in an earlier thread. In all cases, the core file > always indicates a segmentation fault, but the backtraces don't seem to > consistently point

Re: [GENERAL] continued segmentation fault

2006-09-27 Thread Bob
Is there any reason can't update to a newer version. Like 8.x? Geoffrey wrote: > We continue to have segmentation faults of the /usr/bin/postgres process > as I mentioned in an earlier thread. In all cases, the core file > always indicates a segmentation fault, but the backtraces don't seem to >

[GENERAL] continued segmentation fault

2006-09-27 Thread Geoffrey
We continue to have segmentation faults of the /usr/bin/postgres process as I mentioned in an earlier thread. In all cases, the core file always indicates a segmentation fault, but the backtraces don't seem to consistently point to any particular problem. Then again, when you go stomping aro