Re: [GENERAL] concurrent writes

2003-07-30 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 01:07:57PM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote: > > This problem appeard in 7.3.2 but it seems to have been fixed in 7.3.3. > Our administrator complained that there has not been a notice in the > CHANGELOG...so I am hestitating about choosing Postgres vs. Oracle :-) I think your ad

Re: [GENERAL] concurrent writes

2003-07-30 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 12:33:06PM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote: > hi, > > we are running Postgres 7.3.3 successfully on our portal sites There's a nasty bug in 7.3.3 which is fixed in 7.3.4. > N processes need to write update/insert within the same time and within > the same transaction data in on

Re: [GENERAL] concurrent writes

2003-07-29 Thread Dennis Gearon
If I understand your idea, and Postgres, this is like saying you want multiple backend processes, and definite, "NO". As far as I know, one connection == 1 xaction. Andreas Jung wrote: hi, we are running Postgres 7.3.3 successfully on our portal sites under Solaris. For a new project we have the

Re: [GENERAL] concurrent writes

2003-07-29 Thread Ron Johnson
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 05:48, Andreas Jung wrote: > On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 12:42, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > > On 29 Jul 2003 at 12:33, Andreas Jung wrote: > > > we are running Postgres 7.3.3 successfully on our portal sites > > > under Solaris. For a new project we have the requirement that > > >