Rob Sargent wrote:
> Jsyk, I'm toying with a rather large number of small valued
> datapoints per sample. I'm tying text and smallint as well.
You could try "char"[] ...
--
Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
On 03/31/2014 09:48 AM, Steve Atkins wrote:
On Mar 31, 2014, at 8:08 AM, Rob Sargent wrote:
I'm angling toward using a very wide char(1) array. Is the one-byte overhead for
char(n<126) applied to each element or to the array?
Each element, it's a variable length type.
There's probably a be
On Mar 31, 2014, at 8:08 AM, Rob Sargent wrote:
> I'm angling toward using a very wide char(1) array. Is the one-byte overhead
> for char(n<126) applied to each element or to the array?
Each element, it's a variable length type.
There's probably a better way of storing your data, but if you
I'm angling toward using a very wide char(1) array. Is the one-byte
overhead for char(n<126) applied to each element or to the array?
