Tom Lane wrote:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I feel lock_timeout it will be a nice feature . Lemme know what would be
the solution of the above problem from existing set of features.
AFAICS statement_timeout would work just fine for that; or you could
use NOWAIT.
ok, you mean we should p
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I feel lock_timeout it will be a nice feature . Lemme know what would be
> the solution of the above problem from existing set of features.
AFAICS statement_timeout would work just fine for that; or you could
use NOWAIT.
regards, tom lane
--
