Scott Briggs wrote:
> So if you do need to use wal files to catch up a slave, what would
> that process be? If you caught up with wal files, how would streaming
> replication know what positon to start at? And how would you tell
> streaming replication the new position after catching up with wal
>
Thanks Laurenz for the response.
So if you do need to use wal files to catch up a slave, what would
that process be? If you caught up with wal files, how would streaming
replication know what positon to start at? And how would you tell
streaming replication the new position after catching up with
Scott Briggs wrote:
> Hi, can someone please explain the purpose of archive_command on both
> the master and slave when it comes to streaming replication? From
> what I understand so far, what really matters is how many pg_xlog
> files are kept when it comes to reestablishing replication when it
>
Hi, can someone please explain the purpose of archive_command on both
the master and slave when it comes to streaming replication? From
what I understand so far, what really matters is how many pg_xlog
files are kept when it comes to reestablishing replication when it
breaks for some reason.
Let'
