2008/6/26 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> No, nothing like that has ever been reported in any released PG
> version. If the substituted blocks were from non-Postgres files
> then I think you could write off the idea of a PG bug entirely.
> It could still be a software issue though.
Thank you for
"Jacek Rembisz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Postgresql started to log "could not access status of transaction"
> messages. Since the transaction IDs were far away from what
> server was using I took a look at data files i pgsql/base/ and I found
> a total garbage there.
> In five tables (of abo
Hello,
My customer has experienced a serious data corruption.
He was using a posgresql version 8.0.3
I know that it is an old version.
Postgresql started to log "could not access status of transaction"
messages. Since the transaction IDs were far away from what
server was using I took a look at
