Re: [GENERAL] YAGT (yet another GUID thread)

2004-01-16 Thread David Garamond
David Helgason wrote: I'm already using 'real' GUIDs, which in my case means that the database never generates them (since I don't have a generate_real_guid() function in the database (and don't need to). Neither GUID project on gborg (mentioned in another thread) seem to be Mac OSX compatible,

Re: [GENERAL] YAGT (yet another GUID thread)

2004-01-16 Thread David Helgason
On 16. jan 2004, at 12:18, David Garamond wrote: David Helgason wrote: I'm switching right away. The notation doesn't really do anything for me, but that's fine. I've been using bit(128), but always suspected that of being unoptimal (for no particular reason). I think bit(128) is quite efficient

Re: [GENERAL] YAGT (yet another GUID thread)

2004-01-16 Thread David Garamond
David Helgason wrote: I'm switching right away. The notation doesn't really do anything for me, but that's fine. I've been using bit(128), but always suspected that of being unoptimal (for no particular reason). I think bit(128) is quite efficient (OCTET_LENGTH() function shows me it's using 16