On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Jeremy Palmer wrote:
> Marcus' guide looks great.
>
> So what's the pros/cons of using the Kerberos via GSSAPI method, rather
> than going for the SingleSignOn method mentioned by Sunday?
>
> Cons:
More complicated to set up.
There are a few odd things about AD
On 08/25/2012 04:29 AM, Jeremy Palmer wrote:
Marcus' guide looks great.
So what's the pros/cons of using the Kerberos via GSSAPI method, rather than
going for the SingleSignOn method mentioned by Sunday?
The method on the Ubuntu wiki applies to the host OS as a whole.
Pg will still need to k
00 a.m.
To: Craig Ringer
Cc: Jeremy Palmer; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Windows SIngle Sign On - LINUX Server
In real world deployment, LDAP and Kerbero are often combined for
authentication and authorization.
The link below is a well documented howto:
https://help.ubuntu.com
NDAY A. OLUTAYO"
Cc: "Jeremy Palmer" , pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 12:48:01 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Windows SIngle Sign On - LINUX Server
On 08/24/2012 06:10 PM, SUNDAY A. OLUTAYO wrote:
> LDAP will be your best choice for SSO, Ubuntu Linux can aut
On 08/24/2012 06:10 PM, SUNDAY A. OLUTAYO wrote:
LDAP will be your best choice for SSO, Ubuntu Linux can authenticate against AD.
I'm not at all convinced by that. Active Directory functions as a
Kerberos KDC. Kerberos provides secure authentication and (unlike LDAP)
single sign-on.
http://
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Palmer"
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 8:12:55 PM
Subject: [GENERAL] Windows SIngle Sign On - LINUX Server
Hi All,
We are currently running PostgreSQL 8.4 on Windows server 2003 and are planning
to move the i
Hi All,
We are currently running PostgreSQL 8.4 on Windows server 2003 and are planning
to move the instance to Ubuntu 10.4 - yay!. At the same time we will also
upgrade to 9.1. One nice features that we leverage from the windows
configuration is the ability for windows clients to use AD SSO i.
