Re: [GENERAL] Wich hardware suits best for large full-text indexed

2004-03-31 Thread Bill Moran
Diogo Biazus wrote: Bill Moran wrote: Diogo Biazus wrote: Hi folks, Does anyone has an idea of a more cost eficient solution? How to get a better performance without having to invest some astronomicaly high amount of money? This isn't hardware related, but FreeBSD 5 is not a particularly impr

Re: [GENERAL] Wich hardware suits best for large full-text indexed databases

2004-03-31 Thread Dann Corbit
Wednesday, March 31, 2004 10:30 AM > To: Dann Corbit > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Wich hardware suits best for large > full-text indexed databases > > > Dann Corbit wrote: > > >Can we see the underlying tables also? > > > > > CREA

Re: [GENERAL] Wich hardware suits best for large full-text indexed

2004-03-31 Thread Diogo Biazus
Dann Corbit wrote: I see that only table documentos has a unique index. Is it really so that none of the other tables has a key to uniquely identify a record? Perhaps the others have a unique attribute but it was never declared when forming the index? I thougth that a primary key would create

Re: [GENERAL] Wich hardware suits best for large full-text indexed databases

2004-03-31 Thread Dann Corbit
> -Original Message- > From: Diogo Biazus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 11:02 AM > To: Dann Corbit > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Wich hardware suits best for large > full-text indexed databases > > > Dann

Re: [GENERAL] Wich hardware suits best for large full-text indexed

2004-03-30 Thread Teodor Sigaev
explain SELECT qrydocumentos.coddocumento, qrydocumentos.nomedocumento, qrydocumentos.conteudo, qrydocumentos.tamanho, qrydocumentos.hora, qrydocumentos.data, qrydocumentos.codfonte, qrydocumentos.nomefonte, qrydocumentos.numeroimagens as "numeroImagens", qrydocumentos.subtitulo, qrydocumentos.

Re: [GENERAL] Wich hardware suits best for large full-text indexed

2004-03-30 Thread Ericson Smith
Look into running Swish-e instead: http://www.swish-e.org Great speed, nice engine, excellent boolean searches. We run it on several sites each with over 500,000 documents. Performance is consistently sub-second response time, and we also integrate it within PHP, Perl and Postgresql too. I know

Re: [GENERAL] Wich hardware suits best for large full-text indexed

2004-03-30 Thread Bill Moran
Diogo Biazus wrote: Hi folks, I have a database using tsearch2 to index 300 000 documents. I've already have optimized the queries, and the database is vacuumed on a daily basis. The stat function tells me that my index has aprox. 460 000 unique words (I'm using stemmer and a nice stopword list)

Re: [GENERAL] Wich hardware suits best for large full-text indexed databases

2004-03-30 Thread Dann Corbit
Can we see the schema for the table qrydocumentos ? -Original Message- From: Diogo Biazus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 2:32 PM To: Dann Corbit Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Wich hardware suits best for large full-text indexed databases Dann

Re: [GENERAL] Wich hardware suits best for large full-text indexed

2004-03-30 Thread Diogo Biazus
Dann Corbit wrote: What does the EXPLAIN command say about the slowest queries? explain SELECT qrydocumentos.coddocumento, qrydocumentos.nomedocumento, qrydocumentos.conteudo, qrydocumentos.tamanho, qrydocumentos.hora, qrydocumentos.data, qrydocumentos.codfonte, qrydocumentos.nomefonte,

Re: [GENERAL] Wich hardware suits best for large full-text indexed databases

2004-03-30 Thread Dann Corbit
> -Original Message- > From: Diogo Biazus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 1:55 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [GENERAL] Wich hardware suits best for large > full-text indexed databases > > > Hi folks, > > I have a dat

[GENERAL] Wich hardware suits best for large full-text indexed databases

2004-03-30 Thread Diogo Biazus
Hi folks, I have a database using tsearch2 to index 300 000 documents. I've already have optimized the queries, and the database is vacuumed on a daily basis. The stat function tells me that my index has aprox. 460 000 unique words (I'm using stemmer and a nice stopword list). The problem is per