On 10/07/2013 11:05 PM, 高健 wrote:
Hello:
Thank you all for kindly replying my question.
I read the documentation about pg_basebackup.
The description says:
The server must also be configured with max_wal_senders set high enough
to leave at least one session available for the backup.
Dose
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:05 PM, 高健 wrote:
> Hello:
>
>
>
>
>
> Thank you all for kindly replying my question.
>
>
> I read the documentation about pg_basebackup.
>
>
> The description says:
>
> The server must also be configured with max_wal_senders set high enough to
> leave at least one session
Hello:
Thank you all for kindly replying my question.
I read the documentation about pg_basebackup.
The description says:
The server must also be configured with max_wal_senders set high enough to
leave at least one session available for the backup.
Dose it mean:
If I am building a one
On 10/06/2013 09:53 PM, Amit Langote wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 12:02 PM, 高健 wrote:
Hello :
I found that for PG9.2.4, there is parameter max_wal_senders,
But there is no parameter of max_wal_receivers.
max_wal_senders is the maximum number of WAL sender processes that a
primary s
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 12:02 PM, 高健 wrote:
> Hello :
>
>
> I found that for PG9.2.4, there is parameter max_wal_senders,
>
> But there is no parameter of max_wal_receivers.
>
>
max_wal_senders is the maximum number of WAL sender processes that a
primary server can create in response to reque
Hello :
I found that for PG9.2.4, there is parameter max_wal_senders,
But there is no parameter of max_wal_receivers.
Is that to say, that If max_wal_senders are 3.
Then 3 wal_senders will be activated ,
And then on the standby server, there will be 3 "receivers" for
counter-part ?
Th
