On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:21 PM, KGA Official wrote:
> Regarding "are you really going to downgrade again"?
> The upgraded postgres will be bundled along with product code changes and
> other products. So, if someone finds product issues, they will roll back
> everything together.
> So, essentiall
Hi Andreas, Adrian and Venkata,
Regarding "are you really going to downgrade again"?
The upgraded postgres will be bundled along with product code changes and
other products. So, if someone finds product issues, they will roll back
everything together.
So, essentially, yes. One requirement of the
> We are currently running at 9.5.2 and plan to upgrade to 9.5.4, but our
> change requirement needs to plan for a downgrade with data preservation,
> before upgrade is authorized.
>
> Thus, I am asking this: Is it safe to downgrade from 9.5.4 to 9.5.2 by
> simply replacing the binaries? We will ke
On 09/19/2016 09:43 PM, Andreas Kretschmer wrote:
It is binary compatible, so yes. But trust me, there is problem with the
new version.
Just to be clear did you mean:
"But trust me, there is problem with the new version."
Or
But trust me, there is no problem with the new version.
On 20 Se
It is binary compatible, so yes. But trust me, there is problem with the new
version.
On 20 September 2016 06:00:59 CEST, KGA Official wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>We are currently running at 9.5.2 and plan to upgrade to 9.5.4, but our
>change requirement needs to plan for a downgrade with data
>preservat
Hi All,
We are currently running at 9.5.2 and plan to upgrade to 9.5.4, but our
change requirement needs to plan for a downgrade with data preservation,
before upgrade is authorized.
Thus, I am asking this: Is it safe to downgrade from 9.5.4 to 9.5.2 by
simply replacing the binaries? We will keep
