Re: [GENERAL] WAL file internals and why a 64 bit will not work on a 32 bit

2007-05-10 Thread Tom Lane
"Dhaval Shah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If I partition my disk differently between the primary and standby > will that be a problem? Only if the slave runs out of space in a place where the master doesn't. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast

Re: [GENERAL] WAL file internals and why a 64 bit will not work on a 32 bit

2007-05-10 Thread Dhaval Shah
Thanks. If I partition my disk differently between the primary and standby will that be a problem? Regards Dhaval On 5/10/07, Richard Huxton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dhaval Shah wrote: > I do know that WAL files taken from a 64 bit OS will not work on a 32 > bit OS. However I have to prepare

Re: [GENERAL] WAL file internals and why a 64 bit will not work on a 32 bit

2007-05-10 Thread Richard Huxton
Dhaval Shah wrote: I do know that WAL files taken from a 64 bit OS will not work on a 32 bit OS. However I have to prepare a technical answer to this. That is, questions like - why a WAL file from 64 bit will not work in 32 bit. Also does the WAL file differ for same architecture but different k

[GENERAL] WAL file internals and why a 64 bit will not work on a 32 bit

2007-05-09 Thread Dhaval Shah
I do know that WAL files taken from a 64 bit OS will not work on a 32 bit OS. However I have to prepare a technical answer to this. That is, questions like - why a WAL file from 64 bit will not work in 32 bit. Also does the WAL file differ for same architecture but different kind of partitions?