Alan Hodgson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On April 10, 2006 09:28 am, "Just Someone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So my question is: Is what I'm seeing meaning the WAL archiving is
>> working? Or should I expect the file to be deleted?
> If the file is showing up in your archive target location,
On April 10, 2006 09:28 am, "Just Someone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I implemented wal archiving and it seems to be working. The segments
> are being copied by the shell script, and in the pg_log file I see
> this line:
>
> LOG: archived transaction log file "0001001D0096"
>
> But t
I implemented wal archiving and it seems to be working. The segments
are being copied by the shell script, and in the pg_log file I see
this line:
LOG: archived transaction log file "0001001D0096"
But the file is still int he pg_xlog directory. In the documentation I
read that it mig
