> That's good, but does it mean that 7.0 is slower about adding index
> entries than 6.5 was? Or did you have fewer indexes on the table
> when you were using 6.5?
No the indexes have been there all along. My impression is the performance
loss was between 6.5.0 and 6.5.3. I had just ignored th
* Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000526 15:43] wrote:
> "Bryan White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 4, I could probably get by with just 2 If I had to. I will give it a
> try.
>
> > With the indexes deleted I am now getting 40 or 50 updates per second
> > instead of 5.
>
> That's good,
