On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 10:10:50AM +0200, Houssais Hugues wrote:
> Each distant database works on its own domain of data. Then no conflict
> should happen during updates.
> One thing I have not specified is that the distant databases don't handle
> global data but only data collected at the local
rtial databases to one
global database. But maybe I'm wrong... Can you tell me more about this use of
Slony?
Hugues
-Message d'origine-
De : Scott Marlowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : vendredi 5 mai 2006 19:10
À : Houssais Hugues
Cc : pgsql general
Objet : Re: [GENERAL
On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 04:21, Houssais Hugues wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We desire to implement a multi-site server that unifies data from
> distant Postgres databases in a nightly batch. The distant databases
> have all the same architecture (schema). The size of data exchanged
> between distant servers and
Hi,
We desire to implement a multi-site server that unifies
data from distant Postgres databases in a nightly batch. The distant databases
have all the same architecture (schema). The size of data exchanged between
distant servers and the multi-site manager has to be reduced to the strictl
