Re: [GENERAL] Unable to add a new column to a table named "in" (look like a bug ...)

2008-04-17 Thread David Gagnon
Forget about what I said .. I can see the IN and in table in pgadmin III .. IN is the first one... sorry about that:-) David -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Re: [GENERAL] Unable to add a new column to a table named "in" (look like a bug ...)

2008-04-17 Thread David Gagnon
EY, btree (innum) reference=# -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Adam Rich Envoyé : Thursday, April 17, 2008 10:33 AM À : 'David Gagnon'; pgsql-general@postgresql.org Objet : Re: [GENERAL] Unable to add a new column to a table na

Re: [GENERAL] Unable to add a new column to a table named "in" (look like a bug ...)

2008-04-17 Thread Adam Rich
> > It worked Thanks!! But there is definitly something wrong with the > error > message I got (right?): > > reference=# alter table "IN" add column INDESCS VARCHAR[]; > ERROR: column "indescs" of relation "IN" already exists > I don't know, what do you see when you \d "IN" ? When you use d

Re: [GENERAL] Unable to add a new column to a table named "in" (look like a bug ...)

2008-04-17 Thread Rodrigo Gonzalez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Adam Rich Envoyé : Thursday, April 17, 2008 10:15 AM À : 'David Gagnon'; pgsql-general@postgresql.org Objet : Re: [GENERAL] Unable to add a new column to a table named "in" (look like a bug ...) Could you just have a lo

Re: [GENERAL] Unable to add a new column to a table named "in" (look like a bug ...)

2008-04-17 Thread David Gagnon
u gave me. Thanks again David -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Adam Rich Envoyé : Thursday, April 17, 2008 10:15 AM À : 'David Gagnon'; pgsql-general@postgresql.org Objet : Re: [GENERAL] Unable to add a new column to a table

Re: [GENERAL] Unable to add a new column to a table named "in" (look like a bug ...)

2008-04-17 Thread Adam Rich
> Could you just have a look to the output below? I try to add a column > to a > table named "in" (I know "in" is a reserved keyword but the table > exists and > I cannot change it). Postgresql complains that the column already > exist but > it didn't. Am I doing something wrong ? Try: ALTER T

[GENERAL] Unable to add a new column to a table named "in" (look like a bug ...)

2008-04-17 Thread David Gagnon
I all, Could you just have a look to the output below? I try to add a column to a table named "in" (I know "in" is a reserved keyword but the table exists and I cannot change it). Postgresql complains that the column already exist but it didn't. Am I doing something wrong ? Thanks to point me