Thanks for the detailed reply, you've confirmed what I suspected. :)
I guess I have some work to do!
On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 10:19, J. Michael Crawford wrote:
>In my experience, there are just some characters that don't want to be
> converted, even if they appear to be part of the normal 8-bi
Cott Lang wrote:
ERROR: could not convert UTF-8 character 0x00ef to ISO8859-1
Running 7.4.5, I frequently get this error, and ONLY on this particular
character despite seeing quite a bit of 8 bit. I don't really follow why
it can't be converted, it's the same character (239) in both character
sets.
Correction: Four things that need to be done, THREE if you're not
serving up html. Sorry for the editing error.
- Mike
At 01:19 PM 10/29/2004, J. Michael Crawford wrote:
In my experience, there are just some characters that don't want to be
converted, even if they appear to be part
In my experience, there are just some characters that don't want to be
converted, even if they appear to be part of the normal 8-bit character
system. We went to Unicode databases to hold our Latin1 characters because
of this. There was even a case where the client was cutting and pasting
a
ERROR: could not convert UTF-8 character 0x00ef to ISO8859-1
Running 7.4.5, I frequently get this error, and ONLY on this particular
character despite seeing quite a bit of 8 bit. I don't really follow why
it can't be converted, it's the same character (239) in both character
sets. Databases are i
