NICE!!! Worked beautifully! I figured NULL's were not evaluating as a value,
but I didn't have the correct operators:
these constructs effectively act as though null were a normal data value,
> rather than “unknown”.
I guess I wasn't reading the right part of the manuals! LOL! Thanks so
much!
Greg Fischer wrote:
> Hello all!
> I do my best to read and google my way around issues, but I seem to be
> missing something. Probably simple too.
>
> So I have a trigger function, in which I'd like to check if a particular
> column has changed. It works great, unless either the OLD or NEW value
Hello all!
I do my best to read and google my way around issues, but I seem to be
missing something. Probably simple too.
So I have a trigger function, in which I'd like to check if a particular
column has changed. It works great, unless either the OLD or NEW values are
NULL. The purpose is to c
