Re: [GENERAL] Transaction size

2005-01-10 Thread Alban Hertroys
Tom Lane wrote: Alban Hertroys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: It does have a reference to a table with statusses, but those are rather static. I suppose an integrity check is comparable to doing a select with respect to locking strategies? (Meaning that it wouldn't be the cause of my problem). No,

Re: [GENERAL] Transaction size

2005-01-10 Thread Tom Lane
Alban Hertroys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Alban Hertroys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> As they're inserts, and therefore not even touching the same data, I'm >>> quite certain it's not some kind of row locking issue (does that even >>> happen at all with MVCC?). >> >> I'm

Re: [GENERAL] Transaction size

2005-01-10 Thread Alban Hertroys
Tom Lane wrote: Alban Hertroys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Is it possible that there is some limitation to the number of statements in a single transaction? 2^32, and if you'd exceeded it, you'd get a very specific error message saying so. Well, that's a relief. At least it means I'm not running i

Re: [GENERAL] Transaction size

2005-01-07 Thread Tom Lane
Alban Hertroys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is it possible that there is some limitation to the number of statements > in a single transaction? 2^32, and if you'd exceeded it, you'd get a very specific error message saying so. > As they're inserts, and therefore not even touching the same data,

[GENERAL] Transaction size

2005-01-07 Thread Alban Hertroys
Is it possible that there is some limitation to the number of statements in a single transaction? I'm trying to debug a problem where a program locks up during an insert[*]. Actually, there are 3 simultaneous transactions going on, all doing inserts of about 3000 records each. The problem occur