On Jul 13, 2005, at 9:57 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 02:46:01PM +1000, Neil Conway wrote: Vivek Khera wrote: The first sentence rules out MySQL, so the second sentence should read "So that leaves Postgres". Your problem is solved ;-)(If you are accustomed to Oracle, you are p
To everyone,
Thanks very much for your replies, and if these responses are any indication
of Postgres quality then I'd be in good hands.
Ted
_
Dont just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
http://search.msn.click-url.co
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 23:57, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 02:46:01PM +1000, Neil Conway wrote:
> > Vivek Khera wrote:
> > >The first sentence rules out MySQL, so the second sentence should read
> > >"So that leaves Postgres". Your problem is solved ;-)
> > >
> > >(If you are a
> > >The first sentence rules out MySQL, so the second sentence should
> > >read "So that leaves Postgres". Your problem is solved ;-)
> > >
> > >(If you are accustomed to Oracle, you are probably
> expecting an ACID
> > >database, which rules out MySQL too).
> >
> > Does MySQL with InnoDB no
Am Donnerstag, den 14.07.2005, 00:57 -0400 schrieb Alvaro Herrera:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 02:46:01PM +1000, Neil Conway wrote:
> > Vivek Khera wrote:
> > >The first sentence rules out MySQL, so the second sentence should read
> > >"So that leaves Postgres". Your problem is solved ;-)
> > >
>
> "Neil" == Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Neil> Does MySQL with InnoDB not qualify as an ACID-compliant database?
Not when you can store a value that is larger than allowed, and it
is silently truncated to be within range. no *I* integrity there.
That's regardless of InnoDB or not
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-07-14 00:57:57 -0400:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 02:46:01PM +1000, Neil Conway wrote:
> > Vivek Khera wrote:
> > >The first sentence rules out MySQL, so the second sentence should read
> > >"So that leaves Postgres". Your problem is solved ;-)
> > >
> > >(If you are acc
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 02:46:01PM +1000, Neil Conway wrote:
> Vivek Khera wrote:
> >The first sentence rules out MySQL, so the second sentence should read
> >"So that leaves Postgres". Your problem is solved ;-)
> >
> >(If you are accustomed to Oracle, you are probably expecting an ACID
> >da
Vivek Khera wrote:
The first sentence rules out MySQL, so the second sentence should read
"So that leaves Postgres". Your problem is solved ;-)
(If you are accustomed to Oracle, you are probably expecting an ACID
database, which rules out MySQL too).
Does MySQL with InnoDB not qualify as
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 04:24:53PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
>
> On Jul 12, 2005, at 1:16 PM, Ted Slate wrote:
>
> >If I stick with a true RDBMS then Codebase is out. So that leaves
> >Postgres and MySQL.
>
> The first sentence rules out MySQL, so the second sentence should
> read "So that
Even though PostgreSQL is more like an Oracle which is a good thing.
It's like Oracle in function not in cost and adminstration. PostgreSQL
not only fits into the enterprice really well it also fits in the mom
and pop shops(dentist office,corner store, you name it that may not
have any IT folks. S
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 05:16:44PM +, Ted Slate wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I considering moving a product to Solaris/Linux and trying to find a
> good DB. Oracle is out due to cost so as far as i know the only
> reasonable alternatives are Postgres or Codebase or MySQL. Does
> anyone here
On Jul 12, 2005, at 1:16 PM, Ted Slate wrote:
If I stick with a true RDBMS then Codebase is out. So that leaves
Postgres and MySQL.
The first sentence rules out MySQL, so the second sentence should
read "So that leaves Postgres". Your problem is solved ;-)
(If you are accustomed to Ora
: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: [GENERAL] To Postgres or not
Hello Everyone,
I considering moving a product to Solaris/Linux and trying to find a good
DB. Oracle is out due to cost so as far as i know the only reasonable
alternatives are Postgres or Codebase or MySQL. Does anyone here have
There are a number of good, objective, and informative comparisons
available on the Internet, such as http://www.databasejournal.com/sqletc/article.php/3486596.
You can Google something like "Postgresql mysql firebird comparison" to access
these. I am migrating an application from Paradox a
Am Dienstag, den 12.07.2005, 17:16 + schrieb Ted Slate:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I considering moving a product to Solaris/Linux and trying to find a good
> DB. Oracle is out due to cost so as far as i know the only reasonable
> alternatives are Postgres or Codebase or MySQL. Does anyone here
Hello Everyone,
I considering moving a product to Solaris/Linux and trying to find a good
DB. Oracle is out due to cost so as far as i know the only reasonable
alternatives are Postgres or Codebase or MySQL. Does anyone here have any
experience using Codebase or MySql? If I stick with a tru
17 matches
Mail list logo
