[GENERAL] to BLOB or not to BLOB

2001-05-14 Thread Aristide Aragon
Hello I am going to write an application tht writes big amounts of plain text into a database. I thought of using the text type for this, but I don't know if it has a maxlenght, and given that these will be very long texts I started wondered if these would have to be blobs... but they aren't b

Re: [GENERAL] to BLOB or not to BLOB

2001-05-14 Thread KuroiNeko
> I am going to write an application tht writes big amounts of plain text into a database. What kind of data are those? Articles? News/mail messages? Other? > I thought of using the text type for this, but I don't know if it has a maxlenght, and given that these will be very long texts I s

Re: [GENERAL] To BLOB Or Not To BLOB

2000-04-18 Thread Peter Mount
On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Lincoln Yeoh wrote: > At 08:29 PM 17-04-2000 +0100, Peter Mount wrote: > >On Mon, 17 Apr 2000, Adam Ruth wrote: > > > >> > I'm using Linux and ext2fs has a 2GB limit on files, and it seems like > >> > 6.5.3 tables are stored as single files, so better not go down that path >

Re: [GENERAL] To BLOB Or Not To BLOB

2000-04-17 Thread Lincoln Yeoh
At 08:29 PM 17-04-2000 +0100, Peter Mount wrote: >On Mon, 17 Apr 2000, Adam Ruth wrote: > >> > I'm using Linux and ext2fs has a 2GB limit on files, and it seems like >> > 6.5.3 tables are stored as single files, so better not go down that path >> :). >> >> I'm using 6.5.2 and it will split a tabl

Re: [GENERAL] To BLOB Or Not To BLOB

2000-04-17 Thread Thomas O'Dowd
On Mon, Apr 17, 2000 at 06:12:37PM +0930, Stephen Davies wrote: > G'day. > > I do a lot of work with the BASIS textual/multi-media RDBMS package and > run into this question all the time. > > There is one pretty basic answer: > > If you leave BLOBS lying around in the file system - particularl

Re: [GENERAL] To BLOB Or Not To BLOB

2000-04-17 Thread Stephen Davies
G'day. I do a lot of work with the BASIS textual/multi-media RDBMS package and run into this question all the time. There is one pretty basic answer: If you leave BLOBS lying around in the file system - particularly if it is a Novell etc file system - people move them and the links get broke

Re: [GENERAL] To BLOB Or Not To BLOB

2000-04-17 Thread chewie
How do I start this? There are so many different ways to look at this question. Do I save files inside the database, or do I simply use the database as a tool to query information about a given file, it's properties, etc. Instead of making general statements, let me pick specific examples. Let

Re: [GENERAL] To BLOB Or Not To BLOB

2000-04-16 Thread Titus Brown
-> It seems that the issue with large objects is "Why do you want the info in a -> database?" To organize them, of course. -> It seems to me that the point of a database is its ability to order and -> relate data. If you want to retrieve the "large-ish text files" based on -> their content then

Re: [GENERAL] To BLOB Or Not To BLOB

2000-04-16 Thread Marten Feldtmann
> A while ago it was being held that the Postgres large object data type > was too new and not sufficiently tested and mature to be used in a > production environment. I am about to deploy a little database that > involves storing large-ish text files (20-500k) which could be either done > as larg

Re: [GENERAL] To BLOB Or Not To BLOB (fwd)

2000-04-16 Thread Ing. Roberto Andrade Fonseca
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Frank Joerdens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [GENERAL] To BLOB Or Not To BLOB Well I'm currently using the file system for large files. However because of that I can see a few reasons why people might want to use Postgresql to handle th

Re: [GENERAL] To BLOB Or Not To BLOB

2000-04-16 Thread Lincoln Yeoh
Well I'm currently using the file system for large files. However because of that I can see a few reasons why people might want to use Postgresql to handle them. Others can probably mention more. Using Pg to handle large stuff makes more consistent overall and it's easier for you to handle except

Re: [GENERAL] To BLOB Or Not To BLOB

2000-04-16 Thread John Henderson
Hi, It seems that the issue with large objects is "Why do you want the info in a database?" It seems to me that the point of a database is its ability to order and relate data. If you want to retrieve the "large-ish text files" based on their content then I think you need to have the files in the

Re: [reaster@comptechnews.com: Re: [GENERAL] To BLOB Or Not To BLOB]

2000-04-16 Thread Robert B. Easter
On Sun, 16 Apr 2000, you wrote: > There are some programs out there to dump large objects and I've been playing > with one. It's worked well so far. You can get it at > ftp://ftp2.zf.jcu.cz/zakkr/pg/ > > --- > > file not found... Correction: ftp://ftp2.zf.jcu.cz/users/zakkr/pg/

Re: [GENERAL] To BLOB Or Not To BLOB

2000-04-16 Thread Robert B. Easter
On Sun, 16 Apr 2000, Frank Joerdens wrote: > A while ago it was being held that the Postgres large object data type > was too new and not sufficiently tested and mature to be used in a > production environment. I am about to deploy a little database that > involves storing large-ish text files (20

[GENERAL] To BLOB Or Not To BLOB

2000-04-16 Thread Frank Joerdens
A while ago it was being held that the Postgres large object data type was too new and not sufficiently tested and mature to be used in a production environment. I am about to deploy a little database that involves storing large-ish text files (20-500k) which could be either done as large objects