Shane Ambler wrote:
On 2/9/2006 4:11, "Scott Marlowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think that with either the GPL or BSD, code is returned under a type
of coercion. Not necessarily a bad thing, understand.
The coercion of the GPL is legalistic. If you distribute GPL stuff,
you've got to give
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Lane wrote:
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Scott Marlowe wrote:
> ... It's much easier to donate your code to the project
> and let other people maintain it then
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Scott Marlowe wrote:
... It's much easier to donate your code to the project
and let other people maintain it then to try and maintain your
own fork of the code and cross patch the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Lane wrote:
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Scott Marlowe wrote:
>>> ... It's much easier to donate your code to the project
>>> and let other people maintain it then to try and maintain your
>>> own fork of the code and cross patch t
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Scott Marlowe wrote:
>> ... It's much easier to donate your code to the project
>> and let other people maintain it then to try and maintain your
>> own fork of the code and cross patch their changes into your own.
> Ultrix and SunOS are two counter-examp
On 2/9/2006 4:11, "Scott Marlowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that with either the GPL or BSD, code is returned under a type
> of coercion. Not necessarily a bad thing, understand.
>
> The coercion of the GPL is legalistic. If you distribute GPL stuff,
> you've got to give out the sour
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 11:03, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 11:41:41 -0700, Josh Berkus
>> wrote:
[snip]
> The coercion of the GPL is legalistic. If you distribute GPL
> stuff, you've got to give out the sour
On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 11:03, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 11:41:41 -0700,
> Josh Berkus wrote:
> >
> > In general, I think that people who harp on PostgreSQL's lack of a
> > benevolent dictator as an inhibitor to progress are people who are not
> > comfortable with democra
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 11:41:41 -0700,
Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> In general, I think that people who harp on PostgreSQL's lack of a
> benevolent dictator as an inhibitor to progress are people who are not
> comfortable with democracy and are looking for excuses why company X needs
> to "take o
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 09:11:52AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > I thought some people in this group may find this letter from one of
> > NetBSD's founders very interesting.
> >
> > http://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-users/2006/0
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 09:11:52AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> I thought some people in this group may find this letter from one of
> NetBSD's founders very interesting.
>
> http://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-users/2006/08/30/0016.html
>
> It is current, to the point and has some direct corr
I thought some people in this group may find this letter from one of
NetBSD's founders very interesting.
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-users/2006/08/30/0016.html
It is current, to the point and has some direct correlations with our
project that we may want to be aware of.
Sincerely,
Jo
12 matches
Mail list logo
