On Dec 7, 11:42 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tony Caduto)
wrote:
> BigSmoke wrote:
> > On Dec 7, 11:07 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Merlin Moncure") wrote:
>
> >> On 7 Dec 2006 14:02:53 -0800, BigSmoke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>> I'm facing a particular task for which I need any procedural language
> >
BigSmoke wrote:
On Dec 7, 11:07 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Merlin Moncure") wrote:
On 7 Dec 2006 14:02:53 -0800, BigSmoke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm facing a particular task for which I need any procedural language
but PL/PgSQL. I can't use PL/PgSQL because it doesn't allow me to use
On Dec 7, 11:07 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Merlin Moncure") wrote:
> On 7 Dec 2006 14:02:53 -0800, BigSmoke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm facing a particular task for which I need any procedural language
> > but PL/PgSQL. I can't use PL/PgSQL because it doesn't allow me to use
> > local variabl
On 7 Dec 2006 14:02:53 -0800, BigSmoke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm facing a particular task for which I need any procedural language
but PL/PgSQL. I can't use PL/PgSQL because it doesn't allow me to use
local variables such as new and old from a dynamic command.
could you clarify what you ar
I'm facing a particular task for which I need any procedural language
but PL/PgSQL. I can't use PL/PgSQL because it doesn't allow me to use
local variables such as new and old from a dynamic command.
However, I've been unable to find any useful information on the
stability of each particular proce
