Re: [GENERAL] The pgreplication project

2004-06-08 Thread Robert Treat
Well I am working to address the problem, sorry if I am not doing it fast enough. I spoke with the gborg maintainer and found out that the top 5 is based on page views for a project rather than cvs activity. While I've no doubt you've been more active on slony development, I am not so sure that pg

Re: [GENERAL] The pgreplication project

2004-06-08 Thread Jan Wieck
On 6/8/2004 11:49 AM, Robert Treat wrote: Well I am working to address the problem, sorry if I am not doing it fast enough. I spoke with the gborg maintainer and found out that the top 5 is based on page views for a project rather than cvs activity. Aha ... and let me guess, the algorithm does NOT

Re: [GENERAL] The pgreplication project

2004-06-08 Thread Jan Wieck
I guess I have to address a slightly broader audience, or do I conclude from the total lack of interest in this matter that nobody cares if we promote something here as one of our "top five" flagship projects, that is inactive for years and still a prototype implementation against PostgreSQL 6.

[GENERAL] The pgreplication project

2004-06-04 Thread Jan Wieck
Folks, on the gborg front page is a link to the "pgreplication" project as one of five "top" projects. This thing has had zero updates since its last attempts agains PostgreSQL 7.2 and appears literally dead. Can someone please remove that? Jan -- #===