Re: [GENERAL] TEXT field's length limit in PostgreSQL

2001-10-18 Thread Holt, Jack C.
]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 6:50 AM To: Michal 'Samuel' Modestowicz Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [GENERAL] TEXT field's length limit in PostgreSQL On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, [iso-8859-2] Micha³ 'Samuel' Modestowicz wrote: > I know that my qu

Re: [GENERAL] TEXT field's length limit in PostgreSQL

2001-10-18 Thread Brett W. McCoy
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, [iso-8859-2] Micha³ 'Samuel' Modestowicz wrote: > I know that my question may seem trivial, but unfortunately I haven't found > any understandable info on this topic. It's about length limit of the TEXT > field in PostgreSQL. I've heard that the TEXT fields in psql are limite

Re: [GENERAL] TEXT field's length limit in PostgreSQL

2001-10-18 Thread Dr. Evil
> I know that my question may seem trivial, but unfortunately I haven't found > any understandable info on this topic. It's about length limit of the TEXT > field in PostgreSQL. I've heard that the TEXT fields in psql are limited to > 4096 bytes but it's just unbelievable for me. So if I've got te

[GENERAL] TEXT field's length limit in PostgreSQL

2001-10-17 Thread Michał 'Samuel' Modestowicz
Hi, I know that my question may seem trivial, but unfortunately I haven't found any understandable info on this topic. It's about length limit of the TEXT field in PostgreSQL. I've heard that the TEXT fields in psql are limited to 4096 bytes but it's just unbelievable for me. So if I've got text