On 12/17/2014 07:37 PM, Arthur Silva wrote:
This! I'm surprised it took so long to somebody suggest an object store.
I thought they did, a file system:)
On Dec 17, 2014 9:22 PM, "Jonathan Vanasco" mailto:postg...@2xlp.com>> wrote:
I wouldn't even store it on the filesystem if I could a
This! I'm surprised it took so long to somebody suggest an object store.
On Dec 17, 2014 9:22 PM, "Jonathan Vanasco" wrote:
>
> I wouldn't even store it on the filesystem if I could avoid that.
> Most people I know will assign the video a unique identifier (which is
> stored in the database) and
I wouldn't even store it on the filesystem if I could avoid that.
Most people I know will assign the video a unique identifier (which is stored
in the database) and then store the video file with a 3rd party (e.g. Amazon
S3).
1. This is often cheaper. Videos take up a lot of disk space. Havin
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 3:39 AM, VENKTESH GUTTEDAR
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using PostGreSQL 9.3.5 and DJango1.7.5 and python 3.3.
>
> I am working on a application where i will get video files from mobile
> app, and i have to store in the server,
>so my question is how do i store vide
On 12/17/2014 4:55 AM, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
Turns out the Postgres as well isn't really slower at this than the file system.
For small files around 50k both perform similar: the average time to read the
blob from a bytea column was around 2ms whereas the average time to read the
blob from th
On Wednesday, December 17, 2014 01:55:46 PM Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> Albe Laurenz schrieb am 17.12.2014 um 11:07:
> > and the performance will be worse than reading files from the file system.
>
> There is a Microsoft research [1] (from 2006) which tested this "myth" using
> SQL Server. It showed
On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 16:51:10 +0530
VENKTESH GUTTEDAR wrote:
Hi Venktesh,
[you should not reply directly to me; hit reply all to post your messages to
the list]
>
> can you help me in achieving this, i mean how to store it in a file
> system how to fetch it from there.
Nope. It's not post
On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 13:55:46 +0100
Thomas Kellerer wrote:
>
> Another downside you didn't mentioned is the fact that you have to distribute
> the files in the filesystem properly.
> Having thousands or even millions of files in a single directory is not going
> to be maintenance friendly either
Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> Albe Laurenz schrieb am 17.12.2014 um 11:07:
>> and the performance will be worse than reading files from the file system.
>
> There is a Microsoft research [1] (from 2006) which tested this "myth" using
> SQL Server.
> It showed that the database might actually be faster
On 17 December 2014 at 13:55, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> Albe Laurenz schrieb am 17.12.2014 um 11:07:
>> and the performance will be worse than reading files from the file system.
>
> There is a Microsoft research [1] (from 2006) which tested this "myth" using
> SQL Server.
> It showed that the dat
Albe Laurenz schrieb am 17.12.2014 um 11:07:
> and the performance will be worse than reading files from the file system.
There is a Microsoft research [1] (from 2006) which tested this "myth" using
SQL Server.
It showed that the database might actually be faster than the file system.
As this
On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 15:09:40 +0530
VENKTESH GUTTEDAR wrote:
>so my question is how do i store video's or video files in DB, or do i
> need to store only the link of that video file, if yes then where i have to
> store the file and how to access that file to display in an html page.
If you
VENKTESH GUTTEDAR wrote:
> I am using PostGreSQL 9.3.5 and DJango1.7.5 and python 3.3.
>
> I am working on a application where i will get video files from mobile app,
> and i have to store in the server,
> so my question is how do i store video's or video files in DB, or do i need
> to store onl
Hello,
I am using PostGreSQL 9.3.5 and DJango1.7.5 and python 3.3.
I am working on a application where i will get video files from mobile
app, and i have to store in the server,
so my question is how do i store video's or video files in DB, or do i
need to store only the link of that v
14 matches
Mail list logo