On Wed, April 13, 2011 11:16, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> seems to be chugging along at a rather sedate pace.
>
> The replication lag is zero since the master and slave WAL locations match.
>
>
> There seems to be nothing to expedite... why do you say it is slow?
>
>
> Maybe because you see this as an "i
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Henry C. wrote:
> My test replication seems to be proceeding normally, but the process appears
> to be quite slow:
>
> SLAVE
> ...postgres: startup process recovering 000101900024 (1)
> ...postgres: wal receiver process streaming 190/244FEA80
>
Greets,
My test replication seems to be proceeding normally, but the process appears
to be quite slow:
SLAVE
...postgres: startup process recovering 000101900024(1)
...postgres: wal receiver process streaming 190/244FEA80
MASTER
...postgres: wal sender process replicator 1.1.
