Thanks! This seems to be exactly what the issue was.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016, at 03:36 AM, Nick Cleaton wrote:
> On 2 June 2016 at 02:43, Jeff Beck wrote:
> > Hi-
> > We have a master (pg 9.4.4 on Ubuntu 14.10) and a slave (pg 9.4.8 on
> > Centos 7). During a period of heavy use, the slave began comp
On 2 June 2016 at 02:43, Jeff Beck wrote:
> Hi-
> We have a master (pg 9.4.4 on Ubuntu 14.10) and a slave (pg 9.4.8 on
> Centos 7). During a period of heavy use, the slave began complaining
> that the “requested WAL segment xx has already been removed”. But
> the WAL segment was still on the m
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Jeff Beck wrote:
> Hi-
> We have a master (pg 9.4.4 on Ubuntu 14.10) and a slave (pg 9.4.8 on
> Centos 7). During a period of heavy use, the slave began complaining
> that the “requested WAL segment xx has already been removed”. But
> the WAL segment was still
On 06/01/2016 06:43 PM, Jeff Beck wrote:
Hi-
We have a master (pg 9.4.4 on Ubuntu 14.10) and a slave (pg 9.4.8 on
Centos 7). During a period of heavy use, the slave began complaining
that the “requested WAL segment xx has already been removed”. But
the WAL segment was still on the master. The
Hi-
We have a master (pg 9.4.4 on Ubuntu 14.10) and a slave (pg 9.4.8 on
Centos 7). During a period of heavy use, the slave began complaining
that the “requested WAL segment xx has already been removed”. But
the WAL segment was still on the master. The issue was resolved by
manually copying the
