# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-05-19 12:14:58 -0400:
> lister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This was the topic of 20 minutes of conversation in 2 tutorials
> > at BSDCan.
>
> Well, if the BSD people are so concerned about it, why don't they fix
> their bleedin' OS? It's inexcusable to have a "jail
lister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This was the topic of 20 minutes of conversation in 2 tutorials
> at BSDCan.
Well, if the BSD people are so concerned about it, why don't they fix
their bleedin' OS? It's inexcusable to have a "jail" feature that
doesn't cover such a major part of Unix as the
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 10:49, lister wrote:
> Scott Marlowe wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 09:46, lister wrote:
> >
> >
> >> At the BSDCan tutorial last week on jails (and several other times)
> >>there was discussion regarding Postgres's use of system V style
> >>shared memory, and an unfortu
Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 09:46, lister wrote:
At the BSDCan tutorial last week on jails (and several other times)
there was discussion regarding Postgres's use of system V style
shared memory, and an unfortunate side effect of making jail() less
secure. Specifically, to allow P
lister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At the BSDCan tutorial last week on jails (and several other times)
> there was discussion regarding Postgres's use of system V style
> shared memory, and an unfortunate side effect of making jail() less
> secure. Specifically, to allow Postgres to operate in a
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 09:46, lister wrote:
> At the BSDCan tutorial last week on jails (and several other times)
> there was discussion regarding Postgres's use of system V style
> shared memory, and an unfortunate side effect of making jail() less
> secure. Specifically, to allow Postgres to oper
lister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At the BSDCan tutorial last week on jails (and several other times)
> there was discussion regarding Postgres's use of system V style
> shared memory, and an unfortunate side effect of making jail() less
> secure. Specifically, to allow Postgres to operate in
At the BSDCan tutorial last week on jails (and several other times)
there was discussion regarding Postgres's use of system V style
shared memory, and an unfortunate side effect of making jail() less
secure. Specifically, to allow Postgres to operate in a jail()ed
environment, the sysctl :
jail.sys
